https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52763
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to eldnumh from comment #6)
> In the documentation of GCC 4.6.3
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.3/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-
> Wextra-249
>
> as well as in the current one
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-
> Wextra-285
>
> it is written, that -Wextra enables this kind of warnings:
> "The option -Wextra also prints warning messages for the following cases:
> ...
> (C++ only) An enumerator and a non-enumerator both appear in a
> conditional expression. "
That is for cases such as:
enum a { A = -1 };
int foo(int cond, unsigned int value)
{
return cond ? A : value;
}
which are different.
