https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65459
James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |arm*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-03-18
CC| |jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
Host| |arm*-*-*
Summary|munaligned-access still |SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
|produce split access codes |unconditionally set to 1
| |for ARM targets
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from James Greenhalgh <jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
At the very least, I think this should be a decision for the per-core tuning
tables.
I can't see any history as to why it is unconditional, but perhaps an ARM
maintainer can chip in?
