https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65448
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2015-03-17 CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Michal Malecki from comment #0) > Most tools that use these error reports simply skip the first three lines, > as they do not look like "standard compiler error format". It would be nice > to have at least an option to change the format into something like this: Which tools? Shouldn't those tools be fixed instead? Perhaps this would have been a better way to do it (although I would prefer the notes after the error, and it could just not say "note:", to be consistent with what we do for template instantiations), if we could start over again, but now GCC has always behaved like this, if we change it, it may break other tools.