https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65448

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-03-17
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Michal Malecki from comment #0)
> Most tools that use these error reports simply skip the first three lines,
> as they do not look like "standard compiler error format". It would be nice
> to have at least an option to change the format into something like this:

Which tools? Shouldn't those tools be fixed instead? 

Perhaps this would have been a better way to do it (although I would prefer the
notes after the error, and it could just not say "note:", to be consistent with
what we do for template instantiations), if we could start over again, but now
GCC has always behaved like this, if we change it, it may break other tools.

Reply via email to