https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65400
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
ok,
this should fix the second regression:
Index: tsan.c
===================================================================
--- tsan.c (revision 221355)
+++ tsan.c (working copy)
@@ -682,6 +682,7 @@
{
if (gimple_call_builtin_p (stmt, BUILT_IN_NORMAL))
instrument_builtin_call (gsi);
+ gimple_call_set_tail (as_a <gcall *> (stmt), false);
return true;
}
else if (is_gimple_assign (stmt)
--
opcua_p_binary.c.103t.sink-{
opcua_p_binary.c.103t.sink- OpcUa_StatusCode retval.25;
opcua_p_binary.c.103t.sink-
opcua_p_binary.c.103t.sink- <bb 2>:
opcua_p_binary.c.103t.sink: retval.25_5 = OpcUa_Float_P_NativeToWire
(wire_2(D), native_3(D)); [tail call]
opcua_p_binary.c.103t.sink: return retval.25_5;
opcua_p_binary.c.103t.sink-
opcua_p_binary.c.103t.sink-}
--
opcua_p_binary.c.105t.tsan1- <bb 2>:
opcua_p_binary.c.105t.tsan1- _6 = __builtin_return_address (0);
opcua_p_binary.c.105t.tsan1- __builtin___tsan_func_entry (_6);
opcua_p_binary.c.105t.tsan1: retval.25_5 = OpcUa_Float_P_NativeToWire
(wire_2(D), native_3(D));
opcua_p_binary.c.105t.tsan1- __builtin___tsan_func_exit ();
opcua_p_binary.c.105t.tsan1: return retval.25_5;
opcua_p_binary.c.105t.tsan1-
opcua_p_binary.c.105t.tsan1-}
see the "[tail call]" is removed,
and the generated code is now OK.
trying to use -O3 next.
