https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64227

--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2)
> I guess we should resolve this one as fixed and re-open c++/64085, which
> still ICEs for me. Agreed?

Yes, this bug doesn't reproduce anymore, whereas 64085 ICEs.

Reply via email to