https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64227
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2) > I guess we should resolve this one as fixed and re-open c++/64085, which > still ICEs for me. Agreed? Yes, this bug doesn't reproduce anymore, whereas 64085 ICEs.