https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65256
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-03-02 3:21 PM, John David Anglin wrote: > r220868 was ok and r220883 bad. My guess is that the problem was introduced in r220875. Dave
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65256
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-03-02 3:21 PM, John David Anglin wrote: > r220868 was ok and r220883 bad. My guess is that the problem was introduced in r220875. Dave