https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65135
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC| |vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
After r220674, we have
movl z1.1821@GOTOFF(%ebp), %eax
...
movl %eax, %esi
...
movl %esi, 4(%esp)
...
.L6:
movl 4(%esp), %ebx
testl %ebx, %ebx
jne .L9
movl 20(%esp), %eax
movl (%eax,%edx), %eax
cmpl $-1, %eax
je .L11
.L42:
movl 8(%esp), %edi
leal 0(,%eax,4), %edx
movl %ecx, %ebx
addl %edx, %edi
cmpl $101, %ecx
je .L40
movl 12(%esp), %esi
cmpl (%edi), %esi
leal 1(%ebx), %ecx
jne .L6
vs
movl z1.1821@GOTOFF(%ebx), %esi
...
.L8:
testl %esi, %esi
jne .L11
movl 16(%esp), %eax
movl (%eax,%edx), %eax
cmpl $-1, %eax
je .L13
.L43:
movl 4(%esp), %edi
leal 0(,%eax,4), %edx
movl %ecx, %ebx
addl %edx, %edi
cmpl $101, %ecx
je .L41
movl 8(%esp), %ebp
cmpl (%edi), %ebp
leal 1(%ebx), %ecx
jne .L8
RA puts GOT into %ebp and won't use it for this loop.
