https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65077
--- Comment #15 from anders.blomdell at control dot lth.se --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > we have similar handling for > > else if (truth_value_p (code)) > /* Truth value results are not pointer (parts). Or at least > very very unreasonable obfuscation of a part. */ > ; Isn't this unreachable due to + case BIT_FIELD_REF: in the patch? Or would it be hit if somebody tries to encode pointers with a packed bitfield struct/union? No, I won't write a ridiculous testcase to check :-) Again, great thanks.
