https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64927
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > The revision numbers you refer to belong to the 4.9-branch. Indeed -> I was trying to find the commit that fixed the problem (without success). > IMO it is not fixed on 4.8. If there is no easy solution, I'd rather > prefer to mark it in an appropriate way (wontfix?), so that others > can see that this problem is known for particular gcc versions. I think the only "appropriate way" is FIXED as it is the case for 4.9 and trunk. Closing as WONTFIX will be misleading for these revisions. Note that 4.8 will be closed pretty soon.
