https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57822
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > > I am afraid that the test will fail on targets without REAL(10). > > see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00698.html and e.g., > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-02/msg01269.html. Yes, I am aware of the failures and have been testing your version of the test case. I am just squeezing in time when I can. Should have the new test case ready to go in this evening. I have a way to bypass the: 3 38 .999999999999999999999999999999996919E-0001 problem in Comment #7. Then we look for any other architectures that fail.
