https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > OK, this is fixed on the SPARC, but not on the PA where we still have 2 IVs. Correction: we have only one IV on the PA, but it's 'i' and not 'p'. Dave, is the generated code optimimal on the PA or should the compiler use 'p'?