https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867
--- Comment #13 from Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11) > That's the wrong thing to assert: Aha, thank you very much. I obviously did not realize the difference :) Unfortunately I think even if I made this change I probably wouldn't want to enable -Wconditionally-supported here, as it enables some other warning that IIRC isn't desirable here. I ended up writing a gcc plugin to find places passing an aggregate to a varargs function. But I still think some simpler way to get a warning here would be nice.
