https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64139
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |60871
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Here get_binfo_at_offset gives up looking for base of G of type B at offset
128.
It identifies the base field correctly but then it gets lost looking up the
binfo by looking into A instead of G bases.
This is because in memory layout of G there is A in between G's data and G's
virtual base.
I suppose the binfo lookup may really need to be turned into a recursive
function when virtual bases are involved. This seems to be the same issue as
PR60871.
