https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62044
--- Comment #10 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Hi Mikael, Yes, you will see from my comment on the PR that I had come to the same conclusion. However, rather than take PR62044 as a place holder, I will open a new PR. Thanks for the information about the derived type namespaces. Originally they were added with precisely this in mind (and in fact?) but they seem to have fallen into disuse (or not!). Cheers Paul On 26 January 2015 at 13:11, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62044 > > --- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Created attachment 34571 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34571&action=edit > segregate derived type namespaces from regular namespaces > > To convince yourself that sym_root fields are never used in derived type > namespaces, here is a patch that gives a type without sym_root field to > f2k_derived. It passes bootstrapping. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
