https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64768
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code, | |rejects-valid --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #6) > On Sat, 24 Jan 2015, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > typedef int A[]; > > struct { int i; A a; } a; > > This is valid code for C99 and above / gnu89 (i.e., it's valid to use a > typedef when declaring a flexible array member, whenever flexible array > members are accepted). Yeah, initially I had the invalid testcase as in #c0, only then I discovered that we ICE even on a valid testcase with a typedef. Which means there are two issues: a) we ICE, b) we don't accept a code where a flexible array member is a typedef. I'm adjusting the keywords now.