https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60570
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- It would appear so, in which case the following (untested, only quick hack) should work: diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr36320.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr36320.c index d136a69..ebd5191 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr36320.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr36320.c @@ -4,5 +4,5 @@ int z; #if 1 -#elif /* { dg-error "with no expression" } */ +#elif #endif diff --git a/libcpp/directives.c b/libcpp/directives.c index ab4f15c..37cd109 100644 --- a/libcpp/directives.c +++ b/libcpp/directives.c @@ -2036,23 +2036,16 @@ do_elif (cpp_reader *pfile) } ifs->type = T_ELIF; - if (! ifs->was_skipping) + /* See DR#412: "Only the first group whose control condition + evaluates to true (nonzero) is processed; any following groups + are skipped and their controlling directives are processed as + if they were in a group that is skipped." */ + if (ifs->skip_elses) + pfile->state.skipping = 1; + else { - bool value; - /* The standard mandates that the expression be parsed even - if we are skipping elses at this point -- the lexical - restrictions on #elif only apply to skipped groups, but - this group is not being skipped. Temporarily set - skipping to false to get lexer warnings. */ - pfile->state.skipping = 0; - value = _cpp_parse_expr (pfile, false); - if (ifs->skip_elses) - pfile->state.skipping = 1; - else - { - pfile->state.skipping = ! value; - ifs->skip_elses = value; - } + pfile->state.skipping = ! _cpp_parse_expr (pfile, false); + ifs->skip_elses = ! pfile->state.skipping; } /* Invalidate any controlling macro. */ together with a test like the following #if 1 int i; #elif 1/0 #endif #if 1 int j; #elif #endif #if 0 #elif 1/0 /* { dg-error "division by zero" } */ int k; #endif #if 0 #elif /* { dg-error "with no expression" } */ int n; #endif #if 1 # if 1 int l; # elif 1/0 # endif #endif #if 1 # if 0 # elif 1/0 /* { dg-error "division by zero" } */ # endif #endif