https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64478
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > if I use kill -11, I would be really surprised to see > the process freeze. > > It would be good to look at siginfo->si_code > and _not_ continue the normal exception handling > when the si_code is SI_USER or anything <= 0. > > If you receive a signal 11, with si_code == SI_USER, > you can be sure that is sent directly from me, > and I want the process to immediately stop doing what it does > currently and create a core file for later analysis. Possibly, but that's a QoA issue and I'm not sure people really care.
