https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56126

--- Comment #8 from Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Michael Bruck from comment #0)
> In code compiled with -fno-exceptions nothing can be thrown, consequently
> all new operators should imply throw() or a warning/error should occur when
> new operators without throw() are used.

No, as you could (should?) abort/terminate instead of returning NULL.

Reply via email to