https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64077
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> --- (In reply to Andrew Dixie from comment #2) > In p5, is "inaccessible" meant to include friendship relationships granted > by the current scope or instead use the explicit public base rules spelt out > in p8? p5 discusses the static scenario, while p8 discusses the runtime check. > The second part of the patch was implementing the latter, but I now also > think this is invalid. I'm not sure whether I understand your argument. Could you construct a code example that makes your point clearer?
