https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #11 from Tejas Belagod <belagod at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > (In reply to Tejas Belagod from comment #7) > > I tried this, but it still doesn't seem to fold for aarch64. > > > > So, here is the DOM trace for aarch64: > > > > Optimizing statement a = *.LC0; > > Why do we get LC0 in the first place? It seems like it is happening because > of some cost model issue with MOVECOST. > Can the cost model affect something as early as gimple?
