https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
--- Comment #25 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, john at johnmaddock dot co.uk wrote: > While we're opening cans of worms.... intmax_t should clearly be __int128... > just saying! Existing ABIs where intmax_t in libc is 64-bit are why __int128 is what I call a sui generis extended type, not an integer type.
