https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57335
Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, delayed folding fixes wrong-code/valid-code samples.
For invalid-code I see with delayed folding the following error-messages:
t_pr57335.C: In function 'int main()':
t_pr57335.C:29:5: error: non-constant condition for static assertion
static_assert(BitsOrderCheck().IsLsbBottom(), "blah");
^
t_pr57335.C:29:47: in constexpr expansion of
'BitsOrderCheck().BitsOrderCheck::IsLsbBottom()'
t_pr57335.C:29:5: error: accessing 'BitsOrderCheck::Data::bits' member instead
of initialized 'BitsOrderCheck::Data::byte' member in constant expression
Not sure if this is desired.
