https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > The attached patch runs the testcase below without memory leaks but > causes regressions in: > class_allocate_7.f03 > class_to_type_2.f90 > typebound_operator_7.f03 > typebound_operator_8.f03 With the patch in comment 4 I don't see these regressions: [Book15] build_w/gcc% make -k check-gfortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=class* --target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'" ... === gfortran Summary for unix/-m64 === # of expected passes 1091 # of unsupported tests 2 === gfortran Summary === # of expected passes 2182 # of unsupported tests 4 [Book15] build_w/gcc% make -k check-gfortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=typebound* --target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'" ... === gfortran Summary for unix/-m64 === # of expected passes 846 # of expected failures 1 === gfortran Summary === # of expected passes 1692 # of expected failures 2 There is no more ICE for the reduced test in comment 1 (1), but a segmentation fault. However I doubt the code is valid. Thanks for the patch. Further testing in progress.