https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > Can you quote the standard which permits this? My feeling is that the code > is invalid, but I have to admit that it is only a feeling. How do you read the following? > 11.2.2 The USE statement and use association > ... > R1111 rename is local-name => use-name > ... > NOTE 11.9 > There is no prohibition against a use-name or use-defined-operator appearing > multiple times in one USE statement or in multiple USE statements involving > the same module. As a result, it is possible for one use-associated entity > to be accessible by more than one local identier.
