https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63756

--- Comment #5 from Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph dot org> ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> Oh, and nobody will care about long (but otherwise correct) assembly when
> optimization is switched off.

I also don't care about this.

What I care about is the long (but otherwise correct) assembly when
optimization is switched ON.

Reply via email to