https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63756
--- Comment #5 from Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph dot org> --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4) > Oh, and nobody will care about long (but otherwise correct) assembly when > optimization is switched off. I also don't care about this. What I care about is the long (but otherwise correct) assembly when optimization is switched ON.