https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58644
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> I don't understand this PR. The test succeeds even when compiled with
> -fsanitize=address.
I think that the PR is justified. The actual argument should be as Tobias says.
Both &D.2108 and &D.2108.data are valid address. Not only this, they are the
same address. However, should we ever change the class ABI to put the vptr
first, for example, then this will no longer work.
I believe that my imminent fix for PR63205 will correct this issue and so
eliminate this PR.
Paul
