https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63600
--- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin <kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > I would have expected VI instead of IV in the iterator name, but I never > understood the rules for i?86 iterator names. > And, you want the testcase in the testsuite too. Agh, right! Thanks. I'll post patch w/ renamed iterator and a testcase (from this bug)
