https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63173

--- Comment #7 from Fei Yang <fei.yang0953 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to clyon from comment #6)
> (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #5)
> (In reply to
> Venkataramanan from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Fei Yang from comment #3)
>
> > > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #1)
> > > > Confirmed.
> > > 
> > >
> Feel free to propose a patch for them on gcc-patches along the
> > > > lines
> you described in:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-09/msg00046.html
> >
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >   To let you know, we are currently working on this
> issue.
> > >   We are implementing these with builtins.
> > >   Hopefully,
> the patch will be posted this week. Thank you.
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Fei Yang,
>
> > 
> > Ok no issues. I will let you do this. But please asign (In reply to
> Fei Yang
> > from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #1)
>
> > > > Confirmed.
> > > 
> > > Feel free to propose a patch for them on
> gcc-patches along the
> > > > lines you described in:
> > >
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-09/msg00046.html
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > >   To
> let you know, we are currently working on this issue.
> > >   We are
> implementing these with builtins.
> > >   Hopefully, the patch will be
> posted this week. Thank you.
> > 
> > Ok. Next time please assign the
> Bugzilla item to your name, so that we wont
> > be duplicating the work.
> 
> > 
> Linaro / Charles Bayliss was already working on this - he had patches
> out in
> September for this.

It seems that Charles' patches cover
> vldX_lane, but not vldX_dup.

Hi Ramana,
  Do you mean this link:
    https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00678.html

Reply via email to