https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63519
Bug ID: 63519 Summary: missing Wparenthesis warning for x binary_op bool ?: Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: manu at gcc dot gnu.org int foo(bool a, int x, int y, int z) { return x * a ? y : z; } Clang: test.cc:3:16: warning: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '*'; '*' will be evaluated first [-Wparentheses] return x * a ? y : z; ~~~~~ ^ test.cc:3:16: note: place parentheses around the '*' expression to silence this warning return x * a ? y : z; ^ ( ) test.cc:3:16: note: place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first return x * a ? y : z; ^ ( )