https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63411
Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to bin.cheng from comment #2)
> > bt/s .L3
> > mov r1,r2
> > add #3,r2 <<< wrong struct offset '3'
> But r2 is initialized with [.L14] which is _OAM3+3, so the offset actually
> is 6 here, No?
Ouch. Yes. Sorry for the fuzz.
On SH this is a performance regression (it can do only displacements that are
scaled by the access size), but not a wrong-code regression.
