https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63366
Bug ID: 63366
Summary: C++ __complex is not equivalent to __complex double
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 33559
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33559&action=edit
Testcase showing that __complex is not equivalent to __complex double in C++
In function grokdeclarator () in cp/decl.c there is the following comment:
/* If we just have "complex", it is equivalent to
"complex double", but if any modifiers at all are specified it is
the complex form of TYPE. E.g, "complex short" is
"complex short int". */
However in practice __complex is equivalent to __complex int. The attached
testcase shows the problem and can be modified to try against __complex int.
Best regards.
