https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38354
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, adam at consulting dot net.nz wrote: > 3. To demonstrate this, a GNU extension to C++ has no problem computing the > address of the function pointer at load time and storing it in a 32-bit > integer > array. Standard C++ allows static initializers that can only be computed at runtime; there's no such thing as an initializer being invalid for C++ because it's non-constant. Thus, it's not significant that this code is accepted for C++; quite likely the initializers get computed at runtime in the C++ case.
