https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #3)
> (In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> > I assume you found this by using a libc with
> > a malloc that has buffer overflow detection.
>
> Actually, no. We inspected the function manually looking for the
> cause of a test FAIL of bessel_7.f90 and just stumbled across it.
Ah, bessel_7.f90. This test has some tolerances that are at the
very edge of numerical accuracy. If your underlying libm implementation
of yn is poor, you'll get FAIL[ures].
> > I'll commit this later.
>
> Great.
Committed to trunk and all open branches.
Thanks for the bug report.
