https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61982

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #6)
> (In reply to Avi Kivity from comment #5)
> > Ah, I see that non-trivial destructors were fixed in gcc 4.9.
> 
> I'm not sure whether I can agree with "fixed" here. A related (yet
> unresolved) core-language issue is
> 
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#640

Ugh, what a terrible proposal.

Reply via email to