https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61982
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #6) > (In reply to Avi Kivity from comment #5) > > Ah, I see that non-trivial destructors were fixed in gcc 4.9. > > I'm not sure whether I can agree with "fixed" here. A related (yet > unresolved) core-language issue is > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#640 Ugh, what a terrible proposal.