[Bug tree-optimization/56365] Missed opportunities for smin/smax standard name patterns when compiling as C++

[olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56365

--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As of r213381 this problem still exists.

compiled as C 003t.original:

;; Function min (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original


{
  return MIN_EXPR <b, a>;
}


;; Function max (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original


{
  return MAX_EXPR <a, b>;
}


;; Function test_04 (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original


{
  return max (-128, min (127, a));
}


compiled as C++ 003t.original:


;; Function int min(int, int) (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original


return <retval> = a < b ? a : b;


;; Function int max(int, int) (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original


return <retval> = a < b ? b : a;


;; Function int test_04(int, int) (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original


<<cleanup_point return <retval> = max (-128, min (127, a))>>;