https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61803
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #2) > > In this case yes, but this is not always the case: See PR5252. > > I think that's the wrong PR number but I couldn't easily find the > correct one. Sorry, that should have been PR55252 Another relevant one is PR52998
