http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61111
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Starts with r210113, ie the wide-int merge. Though that may just expose the latent problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61111
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Starts with r210113, ie the wide-int merge. Though that may just expose the latent problem.