http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
--- Comment #33 from Michael Chapman <michael.chapman at cortus dot com> ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #30)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #29)
>
> > I like the previous suggestion of using "goto LABEL;". In fact, the warning
> > message could explicitly say "use %<goto %D;%> to silence this warning".
>
> Does this mean that you propose a GCC extension which allows to write this?
>
> goto 5;
> case 5:
>
> I'm not sure if the extension is worth it, and it creates another source of
> errors/unclarities if another switch branch is inserted before "case 5:".
> It looks like fall-through, but it isn't one because the case labels aren't
> aligned.
Why an extension? What is wrong with:-
goto case_5;
case 5: case_5:
....
