http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60743

--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #3)
> Kyrill,
> 
> sorry, to bother you with this,
> but do you see any possibility to
> return to the previous memory footprint?

I'll have a look.

Reply via email to