http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60490
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Because it is redundant with __BYTE__ORDER__ == __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ (etc.)
And, portable apps should use
#include <endian>
#if BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN
anyway. Note that __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ etc. is then fairly ambiguous, because it
looks like a special version of LITTLE_ENDIAN macro, but has completely
different meaning. And it is unclear from it what is little endian, whether
bytes, words, floating point value bytes.
