http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59894
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #0) > PR 59893 considers a different path using LTO to inline at link time the > definition from libsupc++. Note that doing both at the same time: 1) provide an inline version of new 2) LTO-link with libsupc++ might interact badly (or not, I haven't checked). We should test it and if needed warn about it in the documentation or preferably find a workaround.
