http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60142
--- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > as in the case of the varargs x86_64 function that might need > saving xmm registers, [...] > So, does GDB have a > disassemble matcher for the ... prologue, or does that fail too? For the XMM registers saving block there is prologue matching workaround of GCC: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=df15bd07dfd59a5176e0fa7699ab1179205491d9
