http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59996
Bug ID: 59996
Summary: Use OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2 with SHA intrinsics?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
CC: kirill.yukhin at intel dot com
i386 has
/* SHA */
{ OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2, CODE_FOR_sha1msg1, 0, IX86_BUILTIN_SHA1MSG1, UNKNOWN,
(int) V4SI_FTYPE_V4SI_V4SI },
{ OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2, CODE_FOR_sha1msg2, 0, IX86_BUILTIN_SHA1MSG2, UNKNOWN,
(int) V4SI_FTYPE_V4SI_V4SI },
{ OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2, CODE_FOR_sha1nexte, 0, IX86_BUILTIN_SHA1NEXTE,
UNKNOWN, (int) V4SI_FTYPE_V4SI_V4SI },
{ OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2, CODE_FOR_sha1rnds4, 0, IX86_BUILTIN_SHA1RNDS4,
UNKNOWN, (int) V4SI_FTYPE_V4SI_V4SI_INT },
{ OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2, CODE_FOR_sha256msg1, 0, IX86_BUILTIN_SHA256MSG1,
UNKNOWN, (int) V4SI_FTYPE_V4SI_V4SI },
{ OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2, CODE_FOR_sha256msg2, 0, IX86_BUILTIN_SHA256MSG2,
UNKNOWN, (int) V4SI_FTYPE_V4SI_V4SI },
{ OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2, CODE_FOR_sha256rnds2, 0, IX86_BUILTIN_SHA256RNDS2,
UNKNOWN, (int) V4SI_FTYPE_V4SI_V4SI_V4SI },
Should OPTION_MASK_ISA_SHA be used instead of OPTION_MASK_ISA_SSE2?
