[Bug c/59939] No warning on signedness changes caused by implicit conversion

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59939

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4210#c22 mentions that clang does
the opposite.  I wonder if clang is wrong in this warning here.

I am going to say we are behaving the way we expect it and maybe clang is not.