http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 31807 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31807&action=edit preliminary patch I wonder why we can't do what we do for IMPORTED_DECL and avoid special casing NAMELIST_DECL. It looks like the constructor elements even get streamed correctly this way. This untested patch gets rid of the majority of the failures, although I still see 2-3 errors in the dwarf code in tests like namelist_70.cf90: FAIL: gfortran.dg/namelist_70.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/namelist_70.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors) Excess errors: lto1: internal compiler error: in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:20105 0x6b4319 force_decl_die /source/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:20105 0x6b5b59 gen_namelist_decl /source/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:20632 0x6b5379 gen_decl_die /source/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:20435 0x6b391e process_scope_var /source/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:19944 0x6b399a decls_for_scope /source/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:19969 0x6ae9ac gen_subprogram_die /source/gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:18354 etc I'll continue looking at this later, but comments welcome :).
