http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > I'm pretty sure this is my fault. I'd bet for r206379. r206362 is OK, r206444 is not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > I'm pretty sure this is my fault. I'd bet for r206379. r206362 is OK, r206444 is not.