http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
--- Comment #2 from Olivier Parcollet <oparcollet.triqs at gmail dot com> ---
I am not sure.
If I understood correctly, clang is stricter on this sort of issue than gcc,
but I do not know what the standard says.
A minimal version of such code is (from hashtable.h) :
#include <utility>
template<typename T> class A {
int f(int i) const noexcept { return i + 1; }
static_assert(noexcept(std::declval<const A&>().f(0)),"bla bla");
};
int main() {
A<int> a;
}
again gcc compiles it, not clang (same error as before).
Which one is right ?
(even though I don't really see the point of this static_assert in the first
place...).
