http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following patch fixes all three test cases (comment 0, 9 and 11), and is
free of testsuite regressions:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 206273)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c (working copy)
@@ -11903,9 +11903,6 @@ resolve_typebound_procedures (gfc_symbol* derived)
resolve_bindings_derived = derived;
resolve_bindings_result = true;
- /* Make sure the vtab has been generated. */
- gfc_find_derived_vtab (derived);
-
if (derived->f2k_derived->tb_sym_root)
gfc_traverse_symtree (derived->f2k_derived->tb_sym_root,
&resolve_typebound_procedure);
