http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541
Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-12-19
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
could someone please point me at the original post for this patch?
The darwin_function_section() stuff seems to be inconsistent.
Is the intention to say:
if not reordering functions - return the default.
If doing_lto && flag_profile_values ;
ignore frequencies (i.e. return the default)?
why is the action applied to startup and unlikely (but no test for weak)
and not exit and unlikely ..
and not "general and unlikely"
perhaps this is all explained in the original patch - but I couldn't find it on
a quick search.
