http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45198
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (subreg:DI > + (match_operand:V4SF 1 "register_operand" > + "x,x") 0) > > That is not a valid subreg and should have be rejected. This change: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg00900.html may allow (subreg:DI (match_operand:V4SF 1 "register_operand" "x,x") 0)